1
Mark as you always do
Then record how the class did in the app — your questions, your marks, inside your own private workspace.
Post-Marking Intelligence for Science Departments
Your Science marking already contains the answers. MyScienceHOD surfaces them.
After you mark, see what the class actually struggled with — which misconceptions, who needs help, what to reteach. Your HOD gets department visibility without anyone writing an extra report.
- You approve every result
- Private teacher workspace
- Built for Singapore Science
- Free Beta · Jun–Dec 2026
Free throughout Beta. Paid plans from Jan 2027. Beta members get early-adopter terms.
MyScienceHOD · Post-Marking IntelligenceSample datasciencehod.ai
Department overview
P5 Forces / Friction · after marking
Mastery secure
62%
of the class
Classes flagged
3
same misconception
Interventions
4
teacher-approved
Mastery signal
derived from teacher-approved marking
Secure 62% Developing 26% Misconception 12%
Misconception clusters
- Friction direction11 pupils
- Force vs motion8 pupils
- Contact forces5 pupils
Intervention
Approved by teacherSmall-group reteach: friction & motion, using a guided prediction task before practice.
Fictional sample — no real student scripts
What MyScienceHOD does for Science teachers and HODs
After you mark, MyScienceHOD shows what the class actually struggled with — which misconceptions, which pupils, what to reteach. Your HOD sees the same picture across classes, without anyone writing an extra report.
Built around the Singapore MOE Science syllabus — the topics, the known misconceptions, and the assessment rhythm your department already works with. AI does the pattern-finding; teachers make every decision.
✓
Review what the AI drafts
MyScienceHOD drafts the mastery picture and misconception clusters. Nothing counts until you approve it.
3
Reteach where it matters
You get clear next-lesson decisions. Your HOD sees approved patterns across classes — no extra reports.
The problem
Marking workload is heavy — and the learning gaps stay locked in marked papers.
Teachers mark for hours, then work out what the class struggled with by hand. HODs need visibility but shouldn't add to the load. Students lose the chance for help at the moment it matters.
Teacher pain
Hours of marking, then more time working out what the class actually got wrong.
HOD visibility gap
Department leaders need patterns, but teachers are already overloaded with reports.
Support arrives late
When misconceptions stay hidden, students miss help at the moment it matters most.
See it after marking
P5 Forces / Friction — misconception analysis after marking
A sample of the review screen a teacher and HOD inspect, built with fictional data. The point isn't a dashboard — it's knowing which pupils need targeted support before the next lesson moves on.
Mastery summary
P5 Forces / Friction
- 62%Secure
- 26%Developing
- 12%Misconception
Derived from the marking teachers already do — secure transfer drops when the surface type changes.
Misconception clusters
What actually tripped the class up
Friction direction11 pupilsForce vs motion8 pupilsContact forces5 pupilsSmoother = always faster4 pupils
Grouped by misconception, not just by score — so reteaching can target the actual gap.
Suggested intervention
Approved by teacherSmall-group reteach: friction & motion
AI drafted this from the cluster above. The teacher reviewed and approved it — a guided prediction task contrasting rough and smooth surfaces before practice. Nothing reaches students until a teacher approves.
HOD view
Department signal
3 of 5 classes
P5 Forces: same friction misconception across three classes.
Department-wide patterns surface without asking teachers to write extra reports.
Fictional sample — no real student scripts
Join the free Beta
Free until Dec 2026 · You approve every result
Built for both
Built for the teacher who marked it — and the HOD who needs the whole picture.
The same insight, read from two chairs in the staffroom — the teacher who just marked, and the HOD who has to see across classes and levels.
For teachers
“I've just finished marking. What should I reteach tomorrow — and to whom?”
- See what the class actually struggled with
- Turn marking into next-lesson decisions
- Cut post-marking analysis time
- Keep final judgement — always
For HODs
“How is the department actually doing — without asking for another report?”
- Topic-by-topic mastery across every level, refreshed each marking cycle
- Misconception clusters that recur across classes — plan remediation once, at department level
- Intervention status at a glance: approved, in progress, still needs support
- A plain, meeting-ready summary for your reporting cycle
Patterns, not performance ranking — MyScienceHOD never scores or compares your teachers.
Join the free Beta — free until Dec 2026Student support
Spot Science misconceptions earlier — plan targeted interventions sooner.
When misconceptions surface earlier, support can start sooner. Teachers and HODs act on the pattern; students get earlier, more targeted help — before a small gap becomes a fixed misunderstanding.
This is formative assessment done properly — misconception-led, teacher-judged, acted on while it still matters.
Class misconception patterns
Group the gap, not just the grade — so support targets the actual misunderstanding.
Targeted intervention, not broad revision
Teacher-approved follow-up aimed at the pupils who need it, on the topic that needs it.
Support that starts sooner
Patterns surface right after marking, so remedial help can begin in days, not weeks.
Progress the department can see
HODs track whether support is closing the gap — without asking teachers for extra reports.
The support loop
Caught early, closed early — your marking decides, we surface.
- 1
Gap spotted in marking
a misconception surfaces, while it still matters
- 2
Teacher-approved reteach
targeted follow-up for the pupils who need it
- 3
Re-checked next cycle
the next marking round shows whether the gap closed
The loop repeats every marking cycle. No outcomes are promised — the teacher judges what each class needs, every time.
Teaching resources
Practical guides for Primary Science teachers and HODs
Not ready to join the Beta yet? Start with our evidence-backed guides on the work after marking — item analysis, misconceptions, remedial planning, and leading a department. Useful on their own, whether or not you use MyScienceHOD.
Start here · core workflow
From marking to remedial — the full workflow
The loop from a marked paper to a focused reteach, step by step.
AssessmentItem analysis after an exam
Read which wrong answer the class chose — not just the score.
MisconceptionsDiagnosing & correcting misconceptions
The wrong ideas that repeat each year, and how to reteach them.
Remedial planningPlanning focused remedial teaching
Turn learning gaps into proportionate, targeted remediation.
For HODsLeading a Science department
Planning, moderation and review — without adding to teacher load.
Browse all teacher resourcesMarking, misconceptions, remedial planning and department leadership.View the libraryBeyond marking
Start with marking insights. The rest is already being built.
MyScienceHOD is built for the real work behind a Science department — marking, planning, intervention, teacher support, and HOD visibility.
It starts with Post-Marking Intelligence, then opens into a full Science Teacher & HOD operating system — with teachers in charge at every step, shown here with sample data.
HOD view
Department mastery & support trends
Teacher view
Class misconceptions after marking
AI-assistantdraft
Drafts only — teacher approves
Student support
Earlier, more targeted help
Post-Marking Intelligence
Where it starts: mastery signals and misconception clusters from the marking teachers already do.
HOD Control Tower
Department-level trends for support planning — no teacher ranking, no extra reports.
Remedial Pack Builder
Turns teacher-approved intervention decisions into targeted follow-up packs.
Knowledge Hub
Syllabus-aligned topic support with misconceptions, teaching tips, and department learning signals.
Teaching-Year Planner
Connects topics, assessment windows, teaching progress, and HOD planning rhythms.
On-Screen Marking Review
Being tested with sample materials only. Real student scripts are used only if a school explicitly agrees — and not before.
Opened carefully, with schools — never faster than teachers and school leaders are comfortable with.
Built with teacher control and school privacy in mind.
Teachers approve outputs
AI drafts; you decide. Nothing feeds a report or a department view until you approve it.
Schools control their own workspace
Each school's workspace is its own — sign-in protected, with school-scoped access.
Data can be removed at any time
If you stop using MyScienceHOD, you can have your data deleted.
Your materials stay yours
Uploads stay inside your workspace. Nothing joins the shared question bank without your separate permission.
Full details: Data & privacy · Beta information
Start where the work already is
See how marked work becomes teacher-approved insight.
Earlier interventionLess post-marking workDepartment visibility
Free through Beta (Jun–Dec 2026). Start with sample data if you want to explore first — then use your own class and assessment materials in your private workspace. Join before Jan 2027 to lock early-adopter terms.
MyScienceHOD is built in Singapore, alongside the Science teachers and HODs in our founding Beta. It started with a simple observation: the most useful assessment insight in any school sits in stacks of marked papers — and the teacher who marked them never gets it back in a usable form.
Join the founding Beta
Free Jun–Dec 2026 · early-adopter terms.