Teacher review
Time per answer, edit or rejection rate, and feedback usefulness.
Start with marking insight, then see the wider Teacher and HOD cockpit.
One Answer ProofRoutes for the people who mark, lead, review, and decide next steps.
Request Preview AccessReference-backed guides written for Singapore Primary Science teachers and HODs, not filler content.
All GuidesThe boundaries are part of the product, not fine print.
Teacher-in-the-LoopTeacher remains the authority
AI suggestions are drafts
Private teacher workspace
Privacy and data-control first
For school leaders
MyScienceHOD is designed to turn teacher-approved Primary Science marking into class and department action while preserving teacher authority and school data control.
The decision
The proposed answer is a bounded Primary Science pilot with explicit access, data and success controls. No school or MOE approval is currently claimed.
Teacher judgement remains final; AI suggestions are drafts.
Only teacher-approved records may feed official class or HOD insight.
School, teacher and HOD access must be role-scoped.
Retention, deletion and exit arrangements must be agreed before real data is used.
What would be measured
Time per answer, edit or rejection rate, and feedback usefulness.
Exact-mark and within-one-mark agreement against teacher judgement.
Repeated gaps surfaced and interventions considered or approved.
MyScienceHOD does not yet publish pilot outcome or accuracy claims. The framework defines how those results would be measured transparently.
Review one class or one Primary level, a four-to-six-week scope, and pre-agreed data and exit controls. There is no obligation to continue.
Discuss a school pilot